The family of the late Ghanaian highlife legend, Daddy Lumba, has come forward to clarify that the decision to cover his face during the lying-in-state was made in strict accordance with his explicit wishes, as stated in his will. According to Abusuapanin, the family head, Daddy Lumba had instructed that his face should not be exposed after his death. The family asserts that they were honoring his request, emphasizing his right to determine how his funeral should be conducted.
However, this explanation has sparked widespread debate and skepticism among Ghanaians. Many are questioning the credibility of Abusuapanin’s statement, particularly the claim that the late musician’s will contained such instructions. The controversy has led to broader questions about the validity of the will and the role of Abusuapanin in managing the estate.
Key Questions Raised
The public is demanding answers to several critical questions:
• Which High Court in Ghana read the will?
• When was the will read?
• Where was the will read?
• Who actually read the will?
These questions reflect a growing concern about transparency and accountability in the handling of Daddy Lumba’s estate.
The controversy has brought renewed attention to the legal processes surrounding estate administration in Ghana. An executor is appointed to manage the estate of a deceased individual who left a will. The will nominates the executors, and unless a valid objection is raised, the court appoints them to carry out the deceased’s wishes. Executors are responsible for safeguarding estate assets, identifying beneficiaries, settling debts, and ensuring the testator’s desires are fulfilled. In Ghana, any person aged 21 or above can be appointed executor and may also attest to the will.
Ghanaian law allows a testator to deposit their will with the High Court during their lifetime, sealed with both the testator’s and the court’s seal. After the testator’s death, anyone in possession of the will must deposit it in the High Court within 14 days; failure to do so is an offence with a penalty. Legal experts emphasize the importance of careful selection of executors and proper will deposition to avoid complications in estate administration. Authorities remind the public to comply with will custody regulations to prevent legal repercussions.
According to Abusuapanin, Daddy Lumba included the face-covering instruction in his will, raising concerns about the handling of the estate. Under Ghana’s Wills Act, 1971 (Act 360), a will must be in writing, signed by the testator, and attested by two witnesses to be considered valid. The Act also requires that the testator be of sound mind and not under undue influence when making the will.
Amidst the controversy, Ghanaians are calling for greater transparency and accountability in the management of Daddy Lumba’s estate. Some continue to question the credibility of Abusuapanin’s statement and the processes followed in executing the will.
This case highlights the importance of understanding Ghana’s laws and regulations regarding wills and inheritance. As the nation grapples with the complexities of customary and statutory laws, the Daddy Lumba case serves as a significant precedent for future estate administration and legal disputes.
The debate over Daddy Lumba’s will and funeral instructions has exposed gaps in public understanding of Ghanaian inheritance law and estate management. The controversy underscores the need for clear legal procedures, transparency, and accountability in handling wills, especially for prominent figures whose legacies impact many.