By: Alexander Afriyie
A recent incident involving Sammy Gyamfi, the National Communications Officer of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), has ignited a heated debate about the right to privacy in Ghana. Lawyer Martin Kpebu has raised concerns over the alleged violation of Gyamfi’s constitutional right to privacy, as enshrined in Article 18 of the Ghanaian Constitution.
The controversy stems from a video that went viral, showing Gyamfi giving $1,000 to Nana Agradaa, a popular Ghanaian evangelist and former fetish priestess. The video was captured in Gyamfi’s car, and its release has sparked widespread discussion about privacy and the limits of public scrutiny.
Kpebu’s comments suggest that Gyamfi’s privacy was compromised, and he warns that individuals should be cautious about being secretly filmed. “Wait till you are secretly filmed,” Kpebu cautioned, implying that no one is immune to having their private moments captured without consent.
The incident has sparked a mixed reaction, with some people jubilating over the video’s release, while others have expressed concerns about the implications for Gyamfi’s reputation and the potential consequences for privacy in Ghana.
As the debate continues, it’s essential to consider the balance between freedom of expression and the right to privacy. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting individuals’ privacy and the potential consequences of secretly filming others without their consent. Alexander Afriyie