By: Alexander Afriyie
The case of the Ghana chief has sparked intense debate, with many questioning the application of due process. At the heart of the matter lies the issue of procedural fairness and whether the chief has been afforded special treatment.
A review of the case reveals that the chief has enjoyed a level of latitude rarely granted to defendants. With three injunction applications heard in record time and none dismissed with costs, it’s clear that the judicial system has extended a degree of grace.
The question remains: would similar treatment be afforded to other defendants? The answer lies in the specifics of the case and the application of the law. As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is certain – the pursuit of justice demands fairness, equality, and adherence to due process.
The case serves as a reminder that the justice system must balance the rights of all individuals, regardless of their position or status. Ultimately, the outcome will have far-reaching implications, shaping the public’s perception of the judicial system and its commitment to upholding the rule of law. Alexander Afriyie.