By: Alexander Afriyie
The recent absence of both the President and Vice President from the jurisdiction has sparked a contentious debate about the transfer of executive power. According to a court ruling in the Speaker Doe Adjaho non-swearing-in case, whenever the Speaker acts as President, they should be sworn in as acting President. This raises a pertinent question: has there been a swearing-in ceremony for the Speaker to act as President in the current scenario? However the speaker is also out of the jurisdiction so who becomes the acting President of Ghana?
If such a ceremony took place, when and where did it occur, and before whom? The lack of clarity on this matter highlights the need for a more sensible approach to executive power transfer. The current system, where power is transferred like a baton, is inadequate and potentially problematic.
In light of this, it’s worth reconsidering the Supreme Court’s decision in the Asare case. Perhaps it’s time to revisit the ruling and adopt a more practical approach to executive power transfer. After all, executive power is too important to be handled carelessly.
A more thoughtful and deliberate approach to power transfer would help ensure stability and continuity in government, even in times of crisis. It’s essential to prioritize common sense and prudence when it comes to matters of executive power.
As Ghana navigates its democratic journey, it’s crucial to refine its institutions and processes to promote good governance and effective leadership. By re-examining the Asare ruling and adopting a more sensible approach to executive power transfer, Ghana can strengthen its democracy and ensure that power is exercised responsibly. Alexander Afriyie